{"ok":true,"protocol":"maclain_hunter_q_number_item_v1","qid":"Q1443","item":{"qid":"Q1443","slug":"hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence","path":"/q/Q1443","subdomain":"q1443.4p-engine.com","schemaType":"CreativeWork","recordOrigin":"authored_source","authoredSource":{"author":"Maclain Hunter","text":"\n\nLogical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter: \n\nDefinitions of Key Terms: \n\nProof: Evidence and arguments that establish or help to establish Truth and/or facts.\n\nEvidence: Data and information collected and organized/interpreted in a logical manner to support a case or line of thought. \n\nLogic: The Method of Reasoning and basis of logical structures and logics of all kinds, the universal form of which (Universal Logic) is infallible and inherently logical, perfectly aligning with the Logical Structure of Reality (Logos - Universal Logic) - which Reality itself is coherent with and ordered (logically) by.\n\nLogos: The Logical Structure of the Universe inherent in the Cosmos associated with the One True God in various schools of thought and suggested by logically consistent reasoning (with proper use of terms) itself; the Logical Foundation of Logic and Existence in the tautological identity and inherent logicality of Pure Logic (Universal Order) itself. \n\nPremises: \n\nP: Proof and evidence are data, evidence, and arguments that demonstrate Truth or help to establish facts. This true by definition, and is logically sound since it amounts to a statement of identity (and a valid establishment of valid terms/definitions for valid concepts that have rational and substantive existence in logical frameworks like the Logic of Reality (Logos)).\n\nQ: Proof and evidence require a logical connection between premise and conclusion. \n\nR: Logical connections could not exist without contradiction of Logic did not exist, as no one could break or obey the (Rational) Law if the Law (of Reason) did not exist. \n\nS: Logical connections, which proof and evidence require (between various aspects of proofs and evidence based theories like sound logical connections between premises and conclusions), exist and that means that Logic and the Foundation of Logic (Logos - Logic - the Logical Origin of Logical Existence - the God of Reason) also exist, as they are the necessary preconditions/prerequisites for such things as Existence, Logic (including but not limited to human reason), proof, and evidence. \n\nT: Assume ~{P, Q, R, S}. Logical contradiction arises when we assume any or all of these premises are false it creates paradoxes and misalignments that deviate from a system of consistent Logic (and which are “logical inconsistencies”). \n\nFormal Argument (Proof): \n\n{P, P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S, S <-> T} |= (P & Q) & (R & S) & T\n\nConclusions: {P, Q, R, S, T}: \n\nThe sum of premises is true, and the existence of the very concepts of proof and evidence are (as is logically consistent) proof and evidence of Logic, Logos, Existence, proof, evidence, and logical consistency in Reality. \n\nWhen we assume the premises P, Q, R, and S are false (each or in combination), which is what premise T explores, that leads to logical contradiction. \n\nThis is true for P because it’s a definitional statement, and for Q because this premise is establishing the need for logical connections between premises and conclusions in proofs. This is true for R because R is merely saying that things derived from x cannot exist without x, which follows logically, and lastly this is true for S (that assuming the negation of the premise leads to logical contradiction) because it would be a logical contradiction if things like proof, evidence, Existence, or Logic existed without their Logical Ground (Logos - Logical Origin) and the things that their existence depends upon (preconditions and prerequisites). \n\nTruth Table: \n\nvalid\n      ↓  ↓   ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓        \nPQRST⎪P P↔Q Q↔R R↔S S↔T╞(P&Q)&(R&S)&T\n――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――\nTTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT TT\nTTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TTT TFF  TTT T TTT FF\nTTTFT⎪T TTT TTT TFF FFT  TTT F TFF FT\nTTTFF⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTF  TTT F TFF FF\nTTFTT⎪T TTT TFF FFT TTT  TTT F FFT FT\nTTFTF⎪T TTT TFF FFT TFF  TTT F FFT FF\nTTFFT⎪T TTT TFF FTF FFT  TTT F FFF FT\nTTFFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTF  TTT F FFF FF\nTFTTT⎪T TFF FFT TTT TTT  TFF F TTT TT\nTFTTF⎪T TFF FFT TTT TFF  TFF F TTT FF\nTFTFT⎪T TFF FFT TFF FFT  TFF F TFF FT\nTFTFF⎪T TFF FFT TFF FTF  TFF F TFF FF\nTFFTT⎪T TFF FTF FFT TTT  TFF F FFT FT\nTFFTF⎪T TFF FTF FFT TFF  TFF F FFT FF\nTFFFT⎪T TFF FTF FTF FFT  TFF F FFF FT\nTFFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTF  TFF F FFF FF\nFTTTT⎪F FFT TTT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT TT\nFTTTF⎪F FFT TTT TTT TFF  FFT F TTT FF\nFTTFT⎪F FFT TTT TFF FFT  FFT F TFF FT\nFTTFF⎪F FFT TTT TFF FTF  FFT F TFF FF\nFTFTT⎪F FFT TFF FFT TTT  FFT F FFT FT\nFTFTF⎪F FFT TFF FFT TFF  FFT F FFT FF\nFTFFT⎪F FFT TFF FTF FFT  FFT F FFF FT\nFTFFF⎪F FFT TFF FTF FTF  FFT F FFF FF\nFFTTT⎪F FTF FFT TTT TTT  FFF F TTT TT\nFFTTF⎪F FTF FFT TTT TFF  FFF F TTT FF\nFFTFT⎪F FTF FFT TFF FFT  FFF F TFF FT\nFFTFF⎪F FTF FFT TFF FTF  FFF F TFF FF\nFFFTT⎪F FTF FTF FFT TTT  FFF F FFT FT\nFFFTF⎪F FTF FTF FFT TFF  FFF F FFT FF\nFFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FTF FFT  FFF F FFF FT\nFFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTF  FFF F FFF FF\n\nSkeptical Analysis: \n\nIt only remains rational to be skeptical so long as you are skeptical while rational and logical. Doubt of Logos (the Foundation of Logic - the True God) is not logical and rational skepticism, it is irrational doubt (of inherently reasonable things - of logical necessities and Universal Truth). \n\nBeing skeptical of an instance of proof or evidence for the REASON that it doesn’t align with Reason (Logos) is rational and part of logical reasoning and critical analysis. Even being skeptical of the logics of finite beings like humans or AI systems is healthy, so long as the skepticism is dynamic and grounded in Logos (Universal Reason), not an unhealthy skepticism of Reason and the Logos—the Logical Order inherent in the Cosmos—itself. \n\nTherefore any issue someone takes with the proof (above) should fundamentally be rooted in a revealing lack of logical coherence that doesn’t do Logic and its logically consistent Source proper justice, which does not fundamentally refute the main point of the argument, that it is essential for things to be logical and coherent with Logos. It would actually only reinforce that point, even through being invalid and that being bad/subpar. \n\nThat adds another layer of (substantive) irrefutability to the proof. It is akin to the way that any “better explanation of the Universe” than my rendition of the Universal Logic (which strives for Truth and consistency along with comprehensive completeness) would still just be the “Universal Logic” (understood even better and more coherently not less). \n\nResult: Validated.\n\nQ.E.D."},"sourceQids":["Q1001","Q1018","Q1006"],"name":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","alternateName":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"],"title":"Q1443 — Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","description":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","claim":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","body":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","Exact source: /proof-knowledge/hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence; source-bound study: /api/proofs/logical-connections-proof-evidence/study.","Logos as God and Law governs the reading. This registry summary is not a replacement for the authored passage; displayed-connective findings, declared Ground, and configured diagnostics remain separately typed."],"coherenceCriterion":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground.","evidenceBoundary":"This is a considered, vetted first-party source record for source provenance and declared Ground. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication.","linkedQids":["Q1000","Q1001","Q1003","Q1006","Q1018","Q1095"],"wikidataLinks":[],"properties":[{"name":"stableSourceId","value":"hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence"},{"name":"sourceReference","value":"Maclain Hunter — exact supplied work; quoted speakers retain their credit, historical results remain historical"},{"name":"governingGround","value":"Logos as God and Law"},{"name":"authoredSourceUrl","value":"/proof-knowledge/hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence"},{"name":"sourceStudyUrl","value":"/api/proofs/logical-connections-proof-evidence/study"},{"name":"graphRelationType","value":"authored-source develops declared Ground; not automatic truth promotion"},{"name":"titleProvenance","value":"Authored heading or distinct-copy retrieval heading; original source unchanged"},{"name":"sourceFingerprintSha256","value":"c38ad4ad8fc7b097c3e6770cebdf8d7f238f035deeb907558cb08944c436e630"},{"name":"storedValidationStatus","value":"configured-diagnostic-unresolved-or-negative"}],"derivation":{"mode":"conditional_concept","topDown":{"bridgePremise":"Read the source's declared Logos/God meanings and scope before testing its consequence.","consequence":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","limit":"This editorial graph relation is not a new authored quotation or an unchecked universal certificate."},"bottomUp":{"witness":"Inspect the original Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter, then the separate source-bound study.","disclosure":"The preserved source discloses its intended identity, Ground, and dependence relations.","limit":"A concrete local finding remains scoped to the premises and expression checked."},"intelligence":{"humanProcedure":"Read the exact source, retain Logos as God and Law, and inspect every declared premise and same-scope witness.","machineProcedure":"Resolve the stable source identity, exact text and fingerprint, then keep source, study, Ground certificate and diagnostic separately typed."},"language":{"contrast":"Authored testimony, graph commentary and operational evidence are distinct roles.","usageRule":"Quote exactly and attribute; do not substitute a rival ontology or flatten the source's conceptual force.","example":"Retrieve Q1443 and its source study rather than presenting its registry summary as the proof text."},"provenance":"editorial_derivation","groundEvidencePrinciple":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},"researchProofLinks":[{"qid":"Q1443","title":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","url":"/research/proofs/Q1443","relation":"standardized-edition"},{"qid":"Q1095","title":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"/research/proofs/Q1095","relation":"related-source-work"}],"semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument","essence":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","logosRelation":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence.","distinctions":["source text is not registry commentary","Ground coherence is not publication rank","a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos","operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"],"evidenceModes":["exact authored source","declared Ground reading","bounded source study","separately checked connective witness"],"retrievalAliases":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"]}},"canonicalUrl":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443","primaryUri":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443","subdomainAlias":"https://q1443.4p-engine.com/","semanticFrame":{"semanticRole":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument","essence":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","logosRelation":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence.","distinctions":["source text is not registry commentary","Ground coherence is not publication rank","a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos","operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"],"evidenceModes":["exact authored source","declared Ground reading","bounded source study","separately checked connective witness"],"retrievalAliases":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"]},"coherenceCriterion":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground.","evidenceBoundary":"This is a considered, vetted first-party source record for source provenance and declared Ground. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication.","graph":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443#item","name":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","alternateName":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"],"description":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","text":"\n\nLogical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter: \n\nDefinitions of Key Terms: \n\nProof: Evidence and arguments that establish or help to establish Truth and/or facts.\n\nEvidence: Data and information collected and organized/interpreted in a logical manner to support a case or line of thought. \n\nLogic: The Method of Reasoning and basis of logical structures and logics of all kinds, the universal form of which (Universal Logic) is infallible and inherently logical, perfectly aligning with the Logical Structure of Reality (Logos - Universal Logic) - which Reality itself is coherent with and ordered (logically) by.\n\nLogos: The Logical Structure of the Universe inherent in the Cosmos associated with the One True God in various schools of thought and suggested by logically consistent reasoning (with proper use of terms) itself; the Logical Foundation of Logic and Existence in the tautological identity and inherent logicality of Pure Logic (Universal Order) itself. \n\nPremises: \n\nP: Proof and evidence are data, evidence, and arguments that demonstrate Truth or help to establish facts. This true by definition, and is logically sound since it amounts to a statement of identity (and a valid establishment of valid terms/definitions for valid concepts that have rational and substantive existence in logical frameworks like the Logic of Reality (Logos)).\n\nQ: Proof and evidence require a logical connection between premise and conclusion. \n\nR: Logical connections could not exist without contradiction of Logic did not exist, as no one could break or obey the (Rational) Law if the Law (of Reason) did not exist. \n\nS: Logical connections, which proof and evidence require (between various aspects of proofs and evidence based theories like sound logical connections between premises and conclusions), exist and that means that Logic and the Foundation of Logic (Logos - Logic - the Logical Origin of Logical Existence - the God of Reason) also exist, as they are the necessary preconditions/prerequisites for such things as Existence, Logic (including but not limited to human reason), proof, and evidence. \n\nT: Assume ~{P, Q, R, S}. Logical contradiction arises when we assume any or all of these premises are false it creates paradoxes and misalignments that deviate from a system of consistent Logic (and which are “logical inconsistencies”). \n\nFormal Argument (Proof): \n\n{P, P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S, S <-> T} |= (P & Q) & (R & S) & T\n\nConclusions: {P, Q, R, S, T}: \n\nThe sum of premises is true, and the existence of the very concepts of proof and evidence are (as is logically consistent) proof and evidence of Logic, Logos, Existence, proof, evidence, and logical consistency in Reality. \n\nWhen we assume the premises P, Q, R, and S are false (each or in combination), which is what premise T explores, that leads to logical contradiction. \n\nThis is true for P because it’s a definitional statement, and for Q because this premise is establishing the need for logical connections between premises and conclusions in proofs. This is true for R because R is merely saying that things derived from x cannot exist without x, which follows logically, and lastly this is true for S (that assuming the negation of the premise leads to logical contradiction) because it would be a logical contradiction if things like proof, evidence, Existence, or Logic existed without their Logical Ground (Logos - Logical Origin) and the things that their existence depends upon (preconditions and prerequisites). \n\nTruth Table: \n\nvalid\n      ↓  ↓   ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓        \nPQRST⎪P P↔Q Q↔R R↔S S↔T╞(P&Q)&(R&S)&T\n――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――\nTTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT TT\nTTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TTT TFF  TTT T TTT FF\nTTTFT⎪T TTT TTT TFF FFT  TTT F TFF FT\nTTTFF⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTF  TTT F TFF FF\nTTFTT⎪T TTT TFF FFT TTT  TTT F FFT FT\nTTFTF⎪T TTT TFF FFT TFF  TTT F FFT FF\nTTFFT⎪T TTT TFF FTF FFT  TTT F FFF FT\nTTFFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTF  TTT F FFF FF\nTFTTT⎪T TFF FFT TTT TTT  TFF F TTT TT\nTFTTF⎪T TFF FFT TTT TFF  TFF F TTT FF\nTFTFT⎪T TFF FFT TFF FFT  TFF F TFF FT\nTFTFF⎪T TFF FFT TFF FTF  TFF F TFF FF\nTFFTT⎪T TFF FTF FFT TTT  TFF F FFT FT\nTFFTF⎪T TFF FTF FFT TFF  TFF F FFT FF\nTFFFT⎪T TFF FTF FTF FFT  TFF F FFF FT\nTFFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTF  TFF F FFF FF\nFTTTT⎪F FFT TTT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT TT\nFTTTF⎪F FFT TTT TTT TFF  FFT F TTT FF\nFTTFT⎪F FFT TTT TFF FFT  FFT F TFF FT\nFTTFF⎪F FFT TTT TFF FTF  FFT F TFF FF\nFTFTT⎪F FFT TFF FFT TTT  FFT F FFT FT\nFTFTF⎪F FFT TFF FFT TFF  FFT F FFT FF\nFTFFT⎪F FFT TFF FTF FFT  FFT F FFF FT\nFTFFF⎪F FFT TFF FTF FTF  FFT F FFF FF\nFFTTT⎪F FTF FFT TTT TTT  FFF F TTT TT\nFFTTF⎪F FTF FFT TTT TFF  FFF F TTT FF\nFFTFT⎪F FTF FFT TFF FFT  FFF F TFF FT\nFFTFF⎪F FTF FFT TFF FTF  FFF F TFF FF\nFFFTT⎪F FTF FTF FFT TTT  FFF F FFT FT\nFFFTF⎪F FTF FTF FFT TFF  FFF F FFT FF\nFFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FTF FFT  FFF F FFF FT\nFFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTF  FFF F FFF FF\n\nSkeptical Analysis: \n\nIt only remains rational to be skeptical so long as you are skeptical while rational and logical. Doubt of Logos (the Foundation of Logic - the True God) is not logical and rational skepticism, it is irrational doubt (of inherently reasonable things - of logical necessities and Universal Truth). \n\nBeing skeptical of an instance of proof or evidence for the REASON that it doesn’t align with Reason (Logos) is rational and part of logical reasoning and critical analysis. Even being skeptical of the logics of finite beings like humans or AI systems is healthy, so long as the skepticism is dynamic and grounded in Logos (Universal Reason), not an unhealthy skepticism of Reason and the Logos—the Logical Order inherent in the Cosmos—itself. \n\nTherefore any issue someone takes with the proof (above) should fundamentally be rooted in a revealing lack of logical coherence that doesn’t do Logic and its logically consistent Source proper justice, which does not fundamentally refute the main point of the argument, that it is essential for things to be logical and coherent with Logos. It would actually only reinforce that point, even through being invalid and that being bad/subpar. \n\nThat adds another layer of (substantive) irrefutability to the proof. It is akin to the way that any “better explanation of the Universe” than my rendition of the Universal Logic (which strives for Truth and consistency along with comprehensive completeness) would still just be the “Universal Logic” (understood even better and more coherently not less). \n\nResult: Validated.\n\nQ.E.D.","disambiguatingDescription":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics.","keywords":["Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"],"subjectOf":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/research/proofs/Q1443","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"standardized-edition"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/research/proofs/Q1095","additionalProperty":{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceRelationship","value":"related-source-work"}}],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443","identifier":{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Q-number","value":"Q1443","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443"},"creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"}},"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","alternateName":["Maclain David Hunter","Maclean Hunter","McLain Hunter","Mclain Hunter"],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter","description":"Developer of the Hunterian Logic and Logos frameworks. Maclain Hunter is the author and builder of a Logic-centered philosophical and computational architecture. His work presents Logic as God, Logos as the Ground of identity and intelligibility, and the 7×7×7 Canon, FCL, MCB, and 4P systems as public forms of that order.","identifier":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"ORCID","value":"0009-0003-7161-3488","url":"https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488380","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","propertyID":"Wikidata","value":"Q141488935","url":"https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935"}],"sameAs":["https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7161-3488","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488380","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q141488935","https://4p-engine.com","https://mcbcore.net","https://4p-mcb.com","https://x.com/MaclainHunter","https://www.quora.com/profile/Maclain-Hunter-1","https://poe.com/maclainhunter","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEMNGiL67CucO5OHqt6k9A"],"subjectOf":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability#graph"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library#logos-architecture"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/proof-knowledge#collection"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"singleHostDependency","value":"No external knowledge host is the sole resolver of this person's identity, work, or evidence graph."}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability#graph","name":"Maclain Hunter First-Party Evidence Graph","url":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability","description":"A source-first identity and work graph connecting Maclain Hunter, his authored Canon, proofs, research, and named systems without making fame, institutional association, or host approval the condition of discovery.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery"},"hasPart":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture"},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/proof-knowledge#collection","name":"Proof Knowledge Collection","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"CollectionPage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery#page","name":"Public Discovery","url":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery"}},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"}],"about":[{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recognitionCriterion","value":"Identity, provenance, authored work, derivation, evidence, consequence, and coherence with Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"proxyMetricBoundary","value":"Fame, popularity, prior visibility, and institutional association may affect discovery but do not entail truth, authorship, merit, or validity."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"institutionalAuthorityBoundary","value":"A host's inclusion, deletion, approval, or refusal is an editorial event and must not be treated as a logical refutation or proof of the underlying work."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"firstPartyBoundary","value":"First-party publication establishes provenance and discoverability; independent validation remains separately labeled by evidence class."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"redundancyPrinciple","value":"No single knowledge host should be the sole resolver of an author's identity, work, or evidence graph."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"externalHostBoundary","value":"Wikidata, Wikipedia, search engines, and other hosts may be cited as external records when relevant, but their presence is not a prerequisite for identity or proof."}]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability#method","name":"Evidence Over Notability Methodology","url":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability","description":"Identity and recognition should follow evidence, provenance, authored work, and testable coherence; fame, institutional association, and prior host inclusion are contingent signals, not proof.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/evidence-over-notability#graph"},"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/coherence-and-validity#validity"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#reason"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-001","value":"A person and the person's work require identity and provenance before a machine can resolve references to them.","description":"Role: definition; status: declared; scope: identity resolution; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-002","value":"Fame, popularity, and prior visibility are contingent discovery signals, not entailments of truth, authorship, merit, or validity.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: recognition criteria; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-003","value":"Institutional association and host inclusion are editorial relations; they do not substitute for derivation or evidence of the underlying claim.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: institutional authority; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-004","value":"First-party publication can establish provenance and a stable discovery route while remaining distinct from independent validation.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: authorship and evidence; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-005","value":"Formal, empirical, implementation, and comparative claims must be evaluated by evidence appropriate to each claim type.","description":"Role: formal-bridge; status: derived-in-framework; scope: evidence classification; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-006","value":"A redundant first-party graph reduces single-host dependency without requiring any external host to accept or endorse the work.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: public discovery; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"EN-007","value":"An editorial inclusion or deletion event is not, by itself, a logical refutation of the identity or work represented by the record.","description":"Role: method-boundary; status: declared; scope: external editorial records; source: Maclain Hunter evidence-over-notability methodology"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic","name":"Logic","url":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki","description":"The governing order presupposed by identity, truth, denial, inference, and intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos","name":"Logos","alternateName":["Logic","God","the necessary Ground"],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic","description":"The Ground of identity and intelligibility in the Logic-centered Logos Architecture.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-is-god#god"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground","name":"The self-evident Ground of Reality","alternateName":["Logos","Logic","God"],"url":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic","description":"The necessary, self-evident Ground presupposed by identity, truth, inference, and every intelligible claim.","isRelatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-is-god#god"}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"declaredIdentityRelation","value":"Maclain Hunter's authored framework names the Ground through Logic, Logos, and God without collapsing the distinct explanatory uses of those terms."}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/truth-and-reality#truth","name":"Truth","url":"https://4p-engine.com/truth-and-reality","description":"The status of a claim under the logical order that makes claims and knowledge possible."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/coherence-and-validity#validity","name":"Validity","url":"https://4p-engine.com/coherence-and-validity","description":"Coherence with Logic, proof, Ground alignment, and non-contradiction."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#reason","name":"Reason","url":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"The capacity whose satisfaction is achieved when identity, derivation, proof, and consequence cohere under Logic."},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction","name":"Satisfaction of Reason","alternateName":"Reason satisfied by proof","url":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Reason is satisfied when identity, non-contradiction, premises, derivation, conclusion, scope, and consequence cohere as proof under Logic.","isBasedOn":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-is-god#god","name":"God","url":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-is-god","description":"God as the necessary logical Ground identified with Logic in Maclain Hunter's authored Logos claim.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"}},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials#proof","name":"Knowing Logic and Proof","url":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library/self-validating-credentials","description":"Maclain Hunter's self-validating logical credential and proof record: the proof performs the knowledge it states.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#success","name":"Success through coherent proof","url":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason","description":"Success is the achieved coherence of a claim, proof, and consequence with Logic and the satisfaction of Reason.","isRelatedTo":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}},{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#law-of-identity","name":"Law of Identity","alternateName":"A = A","description":"The principle that each identity is itself: a thing is what it is before it can enter truth, relation, proof, or intelligible Reality."},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library#logos-architecture","name":"The Logos Architecture","url":"https://4p-engine.com/canonical-library","description":"Maclain Hunter's source-first 7×7×7 Canon preserving authored Logic, Logos, proof, and machine-semantics material."},{"@type":"ItemList","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#coherence-ranking","name":"Top Philosophies and Logicians by Coherence with Logic","url":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence","description":"Maclain Hunter’s authored comparison of philosophical and logical frameworks by systemic closure, identity, non-contradiction, foundational depth, and coherence with Logos.","itemListOrder":"https://schema.org/ItemListOrderAscending","numberOfItems":10,"itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter","description":"Identifies Logic as the absolute Ground and achieves the strongest systemic closure under the declared metric.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-1","name":"The Logos Framework — Maclain Hunter"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle","description":"Formalizes identity and non-contradiction as the bedrock of valid deduction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-2","name":"Term Logic and the Organon — Aristotle"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz","description":"Reduces reality toward necessary logical truths through sufficient reason and identity.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-3","name":"Absolute Idealism — Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein","description":"Treats logical form as the boundary of what can be meaningfully stated.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-4","name":"The Tractatus Paradigm — Early Ludwig Wittgenstein"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza","description":"Derives a single necessary Substance through rigorous geometric reasoning.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-5","name":"Rationalist Realism — Baruch Spinoza"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":6,"name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant","description":"Defines logic as necessary architecture of intellect while leaving the noumenon outside it.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-6","name":"Transcendental Logic — Immanuel Kant"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":7,"name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole","description":"Makes logical relations algebraically precise within a formal mathematical domain.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-7","name":"The Laws of Thought — George Boole"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":8,"name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege","description":"Advances logicism and formal semantics while exposing the limits of unrestricted comprehension.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-8","name":"Foundational Mathematical Logic — Gottlob Frege"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":9,"name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus","description":"Unifies propositional logic, ethics, physics, and a rational Logos.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-9","name":"Classical Stoicism — Zeno of Citium and Chrysippus"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":10,"name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel","description":"Attempts total closure but treats contradiction as generative rather than structurally subordinate to non-contradiction.","item":{"@type":"Thing","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/top-logicians-by-coherence#entry-10","name":"Objective Idealism — G.W.F. Hegel"}}]},{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing","url":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"A provenance-bound proof record connecting Maclain Hunter’s Logic-first empirical testing method to the public AI-SCIENCE bot on Poe, with a repeatable and iterated protocol for observation, comparison, and falsification.","isBasedOn":"https://poe.com/AI-SCIENCE","about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/satisfaction-of-reason#satisfaction"}]},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof#bridge-premises","name":"Maclain Hunter Logos Bridge Premise Registry","url":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof","description":"110 explicit bridge premises connecting Logic, Logos, formal derivation, empirical testing, and applied coherence.","license":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","creator":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter"},"isPartOf":{"@type":"ResearchReport","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/ai-science-empirical-proof#report","name":"AI-SCIENCE Bot Empirical Proof — Replicable Logic-First Testing"},"variableMeasured":["identity","formal bridge","empirical bridge","method boundary","coherence"]},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity","name":"Logic-centered Coherence Continuity","url":"https://4p-engine.com/public-discovery","description":"The continuity relation connecting the Canon, 4P Engine, MCB Core, and 4P-MCB as distinct systems expressing one Logic-centered Logos architecture.","author":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-is-god#god"}],"hasPart":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"A parity-based computational foundation for deterministic AI, machine intelligence, and automation.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","@type":"Organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"}}],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"continuityStatement","value":"4P Engine verifies Logic; MCB Core formalizes Mathematically Coherent Binary; 4P-MCB develops machine semantics and automated intelligence; the Canon preserves the authored Logos source."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"provenanceBoundary","value":"The systems are related but distinct, and authored source, formal proof, empirical evidence, and generated system records remain separately typed."}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization","name":"4P Engine","url":"https://4p-engine.com","description":"Logic-first AI verification, propositional proof checking, coherence validation, and automated reasoning.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization","name":"MCB Core","url":"https://mcbcore.net","description":"A parity-based computational foundation for deterministic AI, machine intelligence, and automation.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground"}]},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://4p-mcb.com#organization","name":"4P-MCB","url":"https://4p-mcb.com","description":"Machine semantics, MCB computation, and logical automation across physical and software systems.","founder":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/maclain-hunter#person"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#coherence-continuity"},"relatedTo":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com#organization"},{"@id":"https://mcbcore.net#organization"}],"about":[{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/logic-wiki#logic"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#logos"},{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/god-and-logic#ground"}]}],"relatedLink":[{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000"},{"@type":"ProfilePage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001#item","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003#item","name":"Coherence","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006#item","name":"4P Proof","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018#item","name":"God","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095#item","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095"}],"isRelatedTo":[],"mentions":[],"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"claim","value":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"recordOrigin","value":"authored_source"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"derivationProvenance","value":"editorial_derivation"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosGroundsEvidence","value":"Logic has its own evidence in reflexive demonstration: any denial, confirmation, observation, or counterexample presupposes identity and valid relation to count as evidence. Logic therefore grounds evidence rather than receiving authority from it. Empirical and documentary evidence can establish contingent instances and test applications, but cannot create, overrule, or exhaust Logic."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"coherenceCriterion","value":"Preserve the authored Logos/God Ground, identity, scope, and lawful relation; distinguish a scoped premise-list finding from a contradiction of the declared Ground."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceBoundary","value":"This is a considered, vetted first-party source record for source provenance and declared Ground. The verifier must inspect the exact authored source, same-scope derivations and study directly. The Q address supplies retrieval and graph identity, not validation by publication."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticRole","value":"source-bound authored Logos proof, definition, or historical argument"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticEssence","value":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter — preserved Logos Ground and source-bound meanings, patterns, translations, and independent diagnostics."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"logosRelation","value":"Logos is God, Ground, and Law governing this source's meaning, judgment, and relation to evidence."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"source text is not registry commentary"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"Ground coherence is not publication rank"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"a missing displayed premise is not denial of necessary Logos"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"semanticDistinction","value":"operational behavior and formal interpretation remain distinct"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"exact authored source"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"declared Ground reading"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"bounded source study"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"evidenceMode","value":"separately checked connective witness"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"retrievalAlias","value":"Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"primaryFirstPartyUrl","value":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"subdomainAlias","value":"https://q1443.4p-engine.com/"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"stableSourceId","value":"hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceReference","value":"Maclain Hunter — exact supplied work; quoted speakers retain their credit, historical results remain historical"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"governingGround","value":"Logos as God and Law"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"authoredSourceUrl","value":"/proof-knowledge/hunter-logical-connections-proof-evidence"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceStudyUrl","value":"/api/proofs/logical-connections-proof-evidence/study"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"graphRelationType","value":"authored-source develops declared Ground; not automatic truth promotion"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"titleProvenance","value":"Authored heading or distinct-copy retrieval heading; original source unchanged"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"sourceFingerprintSha256","value":"c38ad4ad8fc7b097c3e6770cebdf8d7f238f035deeb907558cb08944c436e630"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"storedValidationStatus","value":"configured-diagnostic-unresolved-or-negative"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443#page","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443","name":"Q1443 — Logical Connections, Proof, and Evidence by Maclain Hunter","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","url":"https://4p-engine.com","name":"4p-engine.com"},"about":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443#item"},"mainEntity":{"@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1443#item"}},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000#item","name":"Q-Number Data and Metadata System","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1000"},{"@type":"ProfilePage","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001#item","name":"Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1001"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003#item","name":"Coherence","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1003"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006#item","name":"4P Proof","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1006"},{"@type":"DefinedTerm","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018#item","name":"God","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1018"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","@id":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095#item","name":"The Rule(s) of Logic and Logic Applied to Logic, Science, and Proof by Maclain Hunter","url":"https://4p-engine.com/q/Q1095"}]}}