Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T23:43:47.539Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:40:44.141Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: 94b4d4022daed28e8d2e47bb76fbde6a346560c87a6f235f79945a58503aaece
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, Q, R} |= (P -> Q) -> R
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
P: My proof demonstrates Logic as a specific example of an “ET” - coherent/observable on Earth, in logical proof.
Q: Seeing Logic/proof is seeing an ET.
R: My research reveals no clearer proof to date of an ET, and no “more logical ET” is feasible.
{P, Q, R} |= (P -> Q) -> R