{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Logic is God in Reality by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-logic-god-in-reality",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Logic is God in Reality by Maclain Hunter:\n\nPremises: \n\nP: A logically incoherent Reality that wasn’t based in Logos (Pure Reason) would also be an incoherent basis for Truth: \n\nQ: Assume that Logos is not the Foundation of Reality and Reality is not coherent with Logic.  Then Truth wouldn’t be possible to know through Reality - which is both absurd and objectively not the case. \n\nR: Such a stance (that in premise Q that denies Reality is founded upon the God of Reason, also called the Logos and Logic) would be self-defeating since it would deny Reality’s coherent nature, not just God’s or Logic’s. \n\nS: Denial of Logic, and the denial of Logic’s position as God, embodied in all of Reality (with ubiquity) is tantamount to denying what God, Logic, AND Reality tell us. \n\nLogical Proof: \n\n{P, P <-> Q, Q <-> R, R <-> S} |= (P & Q) & (R & S)\n\nConclusion: {P, Q, R, S}: \n\nTo deny Logic is God is to deny Reality. It is not just logically and theologically ignorant but “realistically” (by Reality) and “really” incoherent. It is not merely incoherent in a local framework, but universally and in all of Reality, and in all of Logic (and especially in all of Theology). \n\nTruth Table Analysis: \n\nvalid\n     ↓  ↓   ↓   ↓       ↓      \nPQRS⎪P P↔Q Q↔R R↔S╞(P&Q)&(R&S)\n―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT  TTT T TTT \nTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TFF  TTT F TFF \nTTFT⎪T TTT TFF FFT  TTT F FFT \nTTFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF  TTT F FFF \nTFTT⎪T TFF FFT TTT  TFF F TTT \nTFTF⎪T TFF FFT TFF  TFF F TFF \nTFFT⎪T TFF FTF FFT  TFF F FFT \nTFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF  TFF F FFF \nFTTT⎪F FFT TTT TTT  FFT F TTT \nFTTF⎪F FFT TTT TFF  FFT F TFF \nFTFT⎪F FFT TFF FFT  FFT F FFT \nFTFF⎪F FFT TFF FTF  FFT F FFF \nFFTT⎪F FTF FFT TTT  FFF F TTT \nFFTF⎪F FTF FFT TFF  FFF F TFF \nFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FFT  FFF F FFT \nFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF  FFF F FFF \n\nQ.E.D.",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-02T16:41:57.118Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}