{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Logic and the Battle of the Sexes",
  "identifier": "hunter-logic-battle-sexes",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Logic and the Battle of the Sexes by Maclain Hunter\n\nAbstract: I write this to address an underlying theme of many of the complaints I see from what we might call feminists or people (often but not always women) lamenting the “Patriarchy” and how more men aren’t “moral enough” (or the like) to give women more equality and power than men have. \n\nIn that I find the request to be ignorant of Logic and puts men in an impossible position of trying to arbitrarily give away power that is not to be arbitrarily held in the first place by any man, woman, entity, Logic, or Logos. Even God (as Logos) doesn’t get or have arbitrary power, so the demand is at least as absurd to my eye as any woman or man demanding power arbitrarily from God or Logic (Logos).\n\nI will demonstrate these ideas.\n\nPremises:\n\nP: Arbitrary power is a contradiction in Logic and even/especially for the Logos. Reason is power in Reason, and unreasonable power is self-refuting.\n\nQ: No man logically has arbitrary power to begin with. If any man truly has true power by Logos then it was earned by logical engagement with Logic and Reality (Logos; the Ultimate Reality called God in coherent Theology or Logic in the coherent study of Logic).\n\nR: No man has the power to arbitrarily give a woman power, just as no man has true power by taking arbitrary control and having illogical power. \n\nS: All power and (higher) rank in the Order of the Cosmos is attained by logical attainment and demonstrated Coherence, not arbitrary demands or claims to have a “God given right to equal status” (a bastardization of equal rights in limited political contexts or the basic equality of identity that we all “are what we are” and are “created equal” as “images and forms of God (or A is A Logic)” equally.\n\nT: Assume a man arbitrarily or for the mere sake of “equality” (or flatness; or disorder; or conflation) gave a woman, some women, or all women x power and/or x amount of power. That leads merely to the man having done something and the woman/women having gained something arbitrary and illusory that isn’t backed properly by Logos. \n\nProof:\n\n{P, P -> Q, Q -> R, R -> S, S -> T} |= ((P & Q) & (R & S)) & T\n\nTruth Table: \n\nTTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT TTT   TTT T TTT  TT\nTTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TTT TFF   TTT T TTT  FF\nTTTFT⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTT   TTT F TFF  FT\nTTTFF⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTF   TTT F TFF  FF\nTTFTT⎪T TTT TFF FTT TTT   TTT F FFT  FT\nTTFTF⎪T TTT TFF FTT TFF   TTT F FFT  FF\nTTFFT⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTT   TTT F FFF  FT\nTTFFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTF   TTT F FFF  FF\nTFTTT⎪T TFF FTT TTT TTT   TFF F TTT  FT\nTFTTF⎪T TFF FTT TTT TFF   TFF F TTT  FF\nTFTFT⎪T TFF FTT TFF FTT   TFF F TFF  FT\nTFTFF⎪T TFF FTT TFF FTF   TFF F TFF  FF\nTFFTT⎪T TFF FTF FTT TTT   TFF F FFT  FT\nTFFTF⎪T TFF FTF FTT TFF   TFF F FFT  FF\nTFFFT⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTT   TFF F FFF  FT\nTFFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTF   TFF F FFF  FF\nFTTTT⎪F FTT TTT TTT TTT   FFT F TTT  FT\nFTTTF⎪F FTT TTT TTT TFF   FFT F TTT  FF\nFTTFT⎪F FTT TTT TFF FTT   FFT F TFF  FT\nFTTFF⎪F FTT TTT TFF FTF   FFT F TFF  FF\nFTFTT⎪F FTT TFF FTT TTT   FFT F FFT  FT\nFTFTF⎪F FTT TFF FTT TFF   FFT F FFT  FF\nFTFFT⎪F FTT TFF FTF FTT   FFT F FFF  FT\nFTFFF⎪F FTT TFF FTF FTF   FFT F FFF  FF\nFFTTT⎪F FTF FTT TTT TTT   FFF F TTT  FT\nFFTTF⎪F FTF FTT TTT TFF   FFF F TTT  FF\nFFTFT⎪F FTF FTT TFF FTT   FFF F TFF  FT\nFFTFF⎪F FTF FTT TFF FTF   FFF F TFF  FF\nFFFTT⎪F FTF FTF FTT TTT   FFF F FFT  FT\nFFFTF⎪F FTF FTF FTT TFF   FFF F FFT  FF\nFFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTT   FFF F FFF  FT\nFFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTF   FFF F FFF  FF\n\nValid\n\nQED",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-03T01:29:42.877Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}