Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Written formal sequents verified
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: 2026-10-02T18:54:42.618Z (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:37:07.295Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: 7d04607adf0e241bc9ea19370b8c589d9993562c923a481ffbdafd80f84a08ed
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.inference_1' does not depend on any axioms
{P, P -> Q, Q} |= P & Q
Exact source sequent under finite two-valued propositional semantics. Source proposition meanings and Logic/Logos/God Ground are preserved separately; this checks the inference, not unencoded prose.
A Demand of Proof for God by Maclain Hunter
Premises:
P: □: If one (ie - an atheist) demands a "proof", such as proof (y) of God (Logos or “x”) they already presuppose and appeal to Logic (the Logos or “x”) or Universal Reason.
Q: □: Therefore, one relies on the entity (God also called Logic - the Coherent Origin of Reality or “x”) they are asking to be proven when relying on proof (y).
{P, P -> Q, Q} |= P & Q
Ergo: □(P & Q): □(∃(x, y))
Truth Table Analysis:
PQ⎪P P→Q Q╞P&Q
TT⎪T TTT T TTT
TF⎪T TFF F TFF
FT⎪F FTT T FFT
FF⎪F FTF F FFF
(Valid)
Q.E.D.