{
  "author": "Maclain Hunter",
  "title": "Absolute Logic in Universal Contingency by Maclain Hunter",
  "identifier": "hunter-absolute-logic-universal-contingency",
  "sourceKind": "authored-foundational-record",
  "content": "Absolute Logic in Universal Contingency by Maclain Hunter\n\nPremises:\n\nP: Assume universal contingency and nothing that is logically Absolute (or God in that sense of the Absolute or God of Reason, personal or not). \n\nQ: Logic remains something that even while logically contingent (or assumed to be such) cannot both stay Logic and diverge from Logic, as say an incoherent human can stay human while diverging from Logic.\n\nR: Logic is logically valid contingent upon Logic, while other concepts do not without fallacy or incoherence get to “deviate from Logic validly” and be contingent upon only themselves (as Logic could be valid while deviant from all other concepts and needs only alignment with itself for validity under assumed universal contingency - which means “even when we start without assuming Logic as Absolute”. \n\nS: Given {P, Q, R} Logic is logically Absolute (and God in that sense of the thing that all else relies on to exist logically while it relies only on itself for existence) without that being a presupposition and even when the assumption of the opposite is our presupposed starting point.\n\nProof: \n\n{P, P -> Q, Q -> R, ((P & Q) & R) -> S} |= S\n\nTruth Table: \n\nPQRS⎪P P→Q Q→R ((P&Q)&R)→S╞S\n\nTTTT⎪T TTT TTT   TTT TT TT T\nTTTF⎪T TTT TTT   TTT TT FF F\nTTFT⎪T TTT TFF   TTT FF TT T\nTTFF⎪T TTT TFF   TTT FF TF F\nTFTT⎪T TFF FTT   TFF FT TT T\nTFTF⎪T TFF FTT   TFF FT TF F\nTFFT⎪T TFF FTF   TFF FF TT T\nTFFF⎪T TFF FTF   TFF FF TF F\nFTTT⎪F FTT TTT   FFT FT TT T\nFTTF⎪F FTT TTT   FFT FT TF F\nFTFT⎪F FTT TFF   FFT FF TT T\nFTFF⎪F FTT TFF   FFT FF TF F\nFFTT⎪F FTF FTT   FFF FT TT T\nFFTF⎪F FTF FTT   FFF FT TF F\nFFFT⎪F FTF FTF   FFF FF TT T\nFFFF⎪F FTF FTF   FFF FF TF F\n\nFormal Validity: Valid.\n\nSemantic Content: Sound.\n\nOverall Validity and Soundness: Valid and Sound.\n\nQED",
  "formal": null,
  "structuredAuthoredProof": null,
  "authoredSteps": null,
  "recordedAt": "2026-10-03T01:37:25.622Z",
  "originalAuthoredAt": null,
  "propositionMeaningBoundary": "Atomic identifiers retain their meanings in the exact source. No arbitrary truth assignment establishes an ontological or empirical premise; the formal witness checks the written inference."
}