Lean verification registry · Authored proofs · The Logos Architecture
Verified sequents with unresolved formal parts
Axiom-free: true · 1 checked theorem statements.
Lean establishes the listed formal statements and dependencies. The exact authored source, Ground, known premise meanings, application validation and empirical evidence remain separately typed. No unencoded section is certified by a neighboring theorem.
Original source author: Maclain Hunter. Machine formalization: Replit Agent. No original wording was rewritten.
Source registered: not established (not original authorship).
Formalized: 2026-10-03T10:37:05.082Z.
Checked: 2026-10-03T10:38:04.079Z.
Independent timestamp: 2026-10-03T10:42:55.000Z.
Authored source SHA-256: 3211b94553de18d44a03499c2520280e79bdce290d4514c484e07bde354de1b1
Lean source · Verification JSON · Exact archived source JSON · Compiler report · Current authored source page · Signed release and verification instructions
Lean (version 4.7.0, commit v4.7.0, Release) exitCode=0 'HunterAuthored.logical_ground_necessary_existence' does not depend on any axioms
Formal statement: Σ(P, Q?, R?, S?, T?, U?) |= □∃Logos
Constructive necessity of the displayed Logical Ground law-model (identity, noncontradiction, implication and two-state excluded middle), across arbitrary accessibility and unfixed extra premises. The source's broader ontology and God/creator identity remain authored and are not silently replaced by this law-model.
Formal statement: Σ(P, Q?, R?, S?, T?, U?) |= □∃Logos