Authored proof knowledge base · The Logos Architecture

Logic and the Battle of the Sexes

Authored by Maclain Hunter · first-party-authored · authored-foundational-record

Stored 4P source diagnostic: unresolved · finding unverified_concern · admission admitted_provisionally. This intake result is separate from the theorem checks of the exact propositional sequent.

Logic and the Battle of the Sexes by Maclain Hunter Abstract: I write this to address an underlying theme of many of the complaints I see from what we might call feminists or people (often but not always women) lamenting the “Patriarchy” and how more men aren’t “moral enough” (or the like) to give women more equality and power than men have. In that I find the request to be ignorant of Logic and puts men in an impossible position of trying to arbitrarily give away power that is not to be arbitrarily held in the first place by any man, woman, entity, Logic, or Logos. Even God (as Logos) doesn’t get or have arbitrary power, so the demand is at least as absurd to my eye as any woman or man demanding power arbitrarily from God or Logic (Logos). I will demonstrate these ideas. Premises: P: Arbitrary power is a contradiction in Logic and even/especially for the Logos. Reason is power in Reason, and unreasonable power is self-refuting. Q: No man logically has arbitrary power to begin with. If any man truly has true power by Logos then it was earned by logical engagement with Logic and Reality (Logos; the Ultimate Reality called God in coherent Theology or Logic in the coherent study of Logic). R: No man has the power to arbitrarily give a woman power, just as no man has true power by taking arbitrary control and having illogical power. S: All power and (higher) rank in the Order of the Cosmos is attained by logical attainment and demonstrated Coherence, not arbitrary demands or claims to have a “God given right to equal status” (a bastardization of equal rights in limited political contexts or the basic equality of identity that we all “are what we are” and are “created equal” as “images and forms of God (or A is A Logic)” equally. T: Assume a man arbitrarily or for the mere sake of “equality” (or flatness; or disorder; or conflation) gave a woman, some women, or all women x power and/or x amount of power. That leads merely to the man having done something and the woman/women having gained something arbitrary and illusory that isn’t backed properly by Logos. Proof: {P, P -> Q, Q -> R, R -> S, S -> T} |= ((P & Q) & (R & S)) & T Truth Table: TTTTT⎪T TTT TTT TTT TTT TTT T TTT TT TTTTF⎪T TTT TTT TTT TFF TTT T TTT FF TTTFT⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTT TTT F TFF FT TTTFF⎪T TTT TTT TFF FTF TTT F TFF FF TTFTT⎪T TTT TFF FTT TTT TTT F FFT FT TTFTF⎪T TTT TFF FTT TFF TTT F FFT FF TTFFT⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTT TTT F FFF FT TTFFF⎪T TTT TFF FTF FTF TTT F FFF FF TFTTT⎪T TFF FTT TTT TTT TFF F TTT FT TFTTF⎪T TFF FTT TTT TFF TFF F TTT FF TFTFT⎪T TFF FTT TFF FTT TFF F TFF FT TFTFF⎪T TFF FTT TFF FTF TFF F TFF FF TFFTT⎪T TFF FTF FTT TTT TFF F FFT FT TFFTF⎪T TFF FTF FTT TFF TFF F FFT FF TFFFT⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTT TFF F FFF FT TFFFF⎪T TFF FTF FTF FTF TFF F FFF FF FTTTT⎪F FTT TTT TTT TTT FFT F TTT FT FTTTF⎪F FTT TTT TTT TFF FFT F TTT FF FTTFT⎪F FTT TTT TFF FTT FFT F TFF FT FTTFF⎪F FTT TTT TFF FTF FFT F TFF FF FTFTT⎪F FTT TFF FTT TTT FFT F FFT FT FTFTF⎪F FTT TFF FTT TFF FFT F FFT FF FTFFT⎪F FTT TFF FTF FTT FFT F FFF FT FTFFF⎪F FTT TFF FTF FTF FFT F FFF FF FFTTT⎪F FTF FTT TTT TTT FFF F TTT FT FFTTF⎪F FTF FTT TTT TFF FFF F TTT FF FFTFT⎪F FTF FTT TFF FTT FFF F TFF FT FFTFF⎪F FTF FTT TFF FTF FFF F TFF FF FFFTT⎪F FTF FTF FTT TTT FFF F FFT FT FFFTF⎪F FTF FTF FTT TFF FFF F FFT FF FFFFT⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTT FFF F FFF FT FFFFF⎪F FTF FTF FTF FTF FFF F FFF FF Valid QED

Lean 4 verification and timestamps

Read the actual kernel result, axiom dependencies, formal statements and source-bound timestamp · Machine-readable verification

The machine formalization date is separate from the original authored work. See the verification record for exact checked scope and any unresolved parts.

Logic-centered continuity

This authored proof is connected to Logic, Logos, God, and the self-evident Ground of Reality, and to the distinct systems 4P Engine, MCB Core, 4P-MCB, and the source-first Canon. Formal proof, empirical evidence, and system-generated records remain separately typed.